Bumpei Sato vs Weibowen Zou Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L W L W
Form
L L L L L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Sato 1 - 0 Zou
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sato winning 2 and Zou winning 0. The last match between Sato and Zou was at the Korea F8, 05-09-2016, Q2 round, Clay with Bumpei Sato getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bumpei Sato | 1 |
| Weibowen Zou | 0 |
Korea F8(05-09-2016)
6
1
6
2
| Sato | Stats | Zou |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 661 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 39 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 41% (101-145) | Career Total W/L | 31% (17-37) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tiafoe VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bumpei Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
David O'Hare
Player
Bumpei Sato
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Chu-Huan Yi
Player
Bumpei Sato
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
73)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
55
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bumpei Sato
Player
Tin Chen
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andre Dome
Player
Bumpei Sato
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bumpei Sato
Player
Chung Hyo Woo
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Weibowen Zou Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Worarin Kumthonkittikul
Player
Weibowen Zou
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Wattanakul
Player
Weibowen Zou
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pak Long Yeung
Player
Weibowen Zou
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shi Hong Zeng
Player
Weibowen Zou
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Weibowen Zou
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Huixin Wang
Player
Weibowen Zou
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41% (101/145) | Win/Loss | 31% (17/37) |
| 44% (233/302) | Sets Win/Loss | 33% (41/82) |
| 48% (2295/2525) | Games Win/Loss | 43% (478/634) |
| 43% (70/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 25% (8/24) |
| 44% (23/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (9/13) |
| 21% (6/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 147 | Aces Total | 34 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 109 | Total Double Faults | 73 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 508.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 215.7 |
| 62% (1922/3083) | 1st Serve % | 58% (549/949) |
| 66% (1260/1922) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (317/549) |
| 49% (568/1161) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (153/400) |
| 44% (121/278) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (18/60) |
| 38% (1123/2935) | Return Points Win % | 34% (317/928) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (31/47) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (69/95) | Futures W/L | 31% (17/37) |
| 41% (99/241) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (16/53) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (18/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 30% (14/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 81% (113/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (18/12) |
| 19% (113/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (18/6) |
| 7% (133/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (36/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
